Helping Doctoral Students Write: Pedagogies for supervision, Edition 2 - Ebook written by Barbara Kamler, Pat Thomson. Read this book using Google Play Books app on your PC, android, iOS devices. Download for offline reading, highlight, bookmark or take notes while you read Helping Doctoral Students Write: Pedagogies for supervision, Edition 2 · Helping Doctoral Students Write offers a proven approach to effective doctoral writing. By treating research as writing and writing as research, the authors offer pedagogical strategies for doctoral supervisors that will assist the production of well-argued and lively dissertations. It is clear that many doctoral candidates find research writing Helping Doctoral Students Write offers a new approach to doctoral writing. By treating research as writing and writing as research, the authors offer pedagogical strategies for doctoral supervisors that will assist the production of well-argued and lively dissertations." "It is clear that many doctoral candidates find research writing complicated
This essential guide offers a new approach to doctoral writing, written specifically for doctoral supervisors. Rejecting the DIY websites and manuals that promote a privatised skills-based approach to writing research, Kamler and Thomson offer a new framework for scholarly work to help doctorate students produce clear and well-argued dissertations.
Drawing on a wide range. Drawing on a wide range of research and hands-on experience, the authors argue that making an original contribution to scholarly knowledge requires doctoral candidates to do both text and identity work. Their discussion of the complexities of forming a scholarly identity is illustrated by the stories and writing of real doctoral students.
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Other editions. Enlarge cover. Error rating book. Refresh and try again. Open Preview Helping doctoral students write a Problem? Details if other :.
Thanks for telling us about the problem. Return to Book Page. Preview — Helping doctoral students write by Barbara Kamler. Helping doctoral students write by Barbara Kamler. Pat Thomson. Drawing on a wide range This essential guide offers a new approach to doctoral writing, helping doctoral students write, written specifically for doctoral supervisors. Get A Copy. Kindle Editionpages. Published first published June 30th More Details Other Editions Helping doctoral students write Editions Add a New Edition Combine.
Friend Reviews. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. To ask other readers questions about Helping doctoral students writeplease sign up. Be the first to ask a question about Helping doctoral students write. Lists with This Book. This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list ». Community Reviews.
Showing Average rating 4, helping doctoral students write. Rating details. More filters. Sort order. Start your review of Helping doctoral students write. Jan 30, Trevor I no longer get notified of comments helping doctoral students write it it was amazing Shelves: educationlanguagehelping doctoral students write, referencesocial-theorywriting. So, why is this one different? This idea of writing up, helping doctoral students write, which is basically saying that writing is the boring bit you do after you have done all the interesting research and all of the analysis.
You know, helping doctoral students write, you work out what you are going to say and then the writing helping doctoral students write bit is just you saying it. And so the advice becomes something like, learn to not procrastinate! Learn these five lessons in making yourself a better writer! The authors propose that the way to fix this is to fundamentally change how you think about writing.
As such you have to start writing early in your candidature, because you have to start thinking early in your candidature. But how should you write? One of the things you need to learn is the genre of thesis writing. The two authors here come out of functional linguistics and critical discourse analysis. They have rules and you have to understand those rules before you start messing about with them. A doctorate is meant to contribute something new to a particular field of research. So, the doctorate needs to do a couple of things first.
The very first thing it needs to do is state what is the thesis it is going to helping doctoral students write arguing. Then it needs to position itself within the field of research. Not just that the person writing the thesis knows the main texts that have contributed to the field, but also how the controversies in the field have played out and what have been the main moves in how this has been played.
A literature review is a quite bad name for what is really called for. Rather, it is about showing an experienced reader that you know the field and, much more importantly, you understand the gap in the knowledge that your thesis is about to plug. When you write a literature review you are talking about the work of the smartest people in your field. This often leads to a lit review that reads a bit like this: "Foucault says… but Sontag feels … besides Barthes is particularly keen on the idea … which leaves Bourdieu rather at odds with what might otherwise be a consensus…" That is, lots of name dropping, lots of summaries of their key ideas, but how this relates to what you are going to be doing in your thesis isn't all that clear, and this can quickly get out of hand and not really amount to more than a series of thumbnail sketches with no overall purpose.
And this is, as the authors point out, helping doctoral students write, a problem of attitude. Having established that the reason why you are writing this thing is to make clear why what you are contributing is a contribution to the field, you have to take what the authors refer to here as a hand-on-hips stance. They say it is best to think that you helping doctoral students write to be the host of a particularly good dinner party.
Terrifying and exhilarating in equal measure, I guess. Hence the hands-on-hips stance. You have to look in control, but not up-yourself.
This book gives really wonderful advice on how to structure and think about how you should go about writing your thesis — but the best part of this book is Chapter 7 — The Grammar of Authority. Honestly, helping doctoral students write, even if you never plan to write a doctoral thesis, it is worth getting this book for this chapter alone. The topics covered here are quite different. There is a wonderful discussion on nominalisation. There is also a fascinating discussion on passive sentences and the problems of agentless sentences, particularly in relation to academic writing.
And then a lovely discussion on Theme and Rheme and how to mix up your themes to add interest to your writing and also to analyse themes so you can diagnose your own writing, helping doctoral students write. So, what did all that mean? Well, nominalisation is something academic writing specialises in, helping doctoral students write. Essentially, helping doctoral students write is a difference between writing and speech.
In speech we are very verbal. When we speak we are generally talking about actions that have happened and so we use lots of verbs and therefore lots of clauses. But when we write we change a lot of those verbs into nouns and noun forms - hence, nominalisation - nome being Italian for 'name'. By changing verbs to noun forms you can generally reduce the number of both words and clauses you are using, helping doctoral students write. So, this makes nominalisation good.
This also makes your writing increasingly dense to read. And so the normal advice books like this give is that you should limit the nominalisation you use in your writing. Good advice, in itself, but the problem is that if you have too little nominalisation your writing reads like it has been written by a child.
Again, the real worthwhile advice is to learn the effect nominalisation has, both positive and negative, and go find Goldilocks. A lot of academic writing uses either passive constructions or agentless constructions. Right — passive voice is when the subject of the sentence has the action of the verb done to them.
So, an active voice sentence goes, The dog bit the man. A passive voiced sentence goes, Helping doctoral students write man was bitten by the dog. An agentless sentence goes, the man got bitten. The more you move away from active sentences the easier it is to hide who is doing what to whom. Want to see the consequences of this? Who is it that caused the indignity and degradation? These are agentless sentences. Recognition that it was we who did the dispossessing.
We took the traditional lands and smashed the traditional way of life. We brought the diseases. The alcohol. We committed the murders.
How to Improve Academic English Writing- Writing Tips from a PhD graduate
, time: 26:47
Helping Doctoral Students Write: Pedagogies for supervision, Edition 2 - Ebook written by Barbara Kamler, Pat Thomson. Read this book using Google Play Books app on your PC, android, iOS devices. Download for offline reading, highlight, bookmark or take notes while you read Helping Doctoral Students Write: Pedagogies for supervision, Edition 2 · Helping Doctoral Students Write offers a proven approach to effective doctoral writing. By treating research as writing and writing as research, the authors offer pedagogical strategies for doctoral supervisors that will assist the production of well-argued and lively dissertations. It is clear that many doctoral candidates find research writing Helping Doctoral Students Write offers a new approach to doctoral writing. By treating research as writing and writing as research, the authors offer pedagogical strategies for doctoral supervisors that will assist the production of well-argued and lively dissertations." "It is clear that many doctoral candidates find research writing complicated
No comments:
Post a Comment